JPMorgan Wins Landmark Case: Leveraged Loans Declared Non-Securities by US Appeals Court

JPMorgan Chase & Co. has emerged triumphant from a federal appeals court ruling that designates a substantial leveraged loan of $1.8 billion as non-security. The decision, pronounced by the US Court of Appeals in Manhattan, holds broader implications that resonate across the banking and private equity sectors.

Ad

The Background

The legal dispute stems from allegations of securities fraud, centering around a trustee representing note purchasers involved in a syndicated loan arrangement led by JPMorgan in 2014. Following the initiation of trading for these notes, the borrower, Millennium Health, a drug-testing firm, encountered legal complications that culminated in a bankruptcy filing the subsequent year.

Verdict Significance

Central to the contention was the classification of loan notes as securities. A ruling against JPMorgan could have triggered far-reaching ramifications for the regulation of the leveraged loan market. A previous decision by a lower court had already dismissed the trustee's allegations of fraud on the grounds that the notes did not meet the criteria for securities.

Advertisement

Circuit Judge Jose Cabranes, speaking on behalf of the appellate panel consisting of three judges, reinforced, “The District Court did not erroneously dismiss plaintiff’s state-law securities claims because plaintiff failed to plausibly suggest that the notes are securities.”

SEC's Stance and Industry Response

Notably, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chose not to express its perspective on whether leveraged loans should be treated as securities. This decision added complexity to the scenario, with its implications seen as minimizing the likelihood of the court challenging the existing status quo.

The finance sector, including private equity firms, closely monitored this case due to its profound implications. The Loan Syndications and Trading Association, representing banks engaged in similar loan transactions, actively engaged with the SEC during its deliberations. The association held over ten meetings with SEC officials, including three of its five commissioners.

Kirschner's Allegations

Marc Kirschner, the trustee representing note purchasers, alleged that JPMorgan and other banks had withheld essential information that could have alerted investors to Millennium's challenges. Millennium Health's announcement in May 2015 of a $246 million settlement with the Justice Department and other entities concerning billing fraud further underlined the allegations.

Verdict's Impact

The legal battle, formally titled Kirschner v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, 21-2726, unfolded within the Second US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan. Beyond the immediate parties involved, the ruling carries broader implications, influencing how financial instruments are defined and classified within the contemporary economic landscape. This landmark decision underscores the dynamic shifts occurring in the realm of securities and their legal interpretations.

Court Decision Document Attached Here: