Iran Threatens Oil Shipping Chaos After U.S. Airstrikes

Iran may retaliate against U.S. airstrikes by targeting oil flows in the Strait of Hormuz, raising fears of global energy disruption and price surges.

Jun 22, 2025 - 12:27
Jun 22, 2025 - 12:28
 65
Iran Threatens Oil Shipping Chaos After U.S. Airstrikes
U.S.-Iran tensions and potential threat to global oil shipping lanes

As U.S. airstrikes hit Iranian nuclear sites and diplomatic backchannels fall silent, Tehran is facing mounting pressure to respond—this time with real consequences. At the center of global concern sits the Strait of Hormuz, a maritime bottleneck responsible for nearly 20% of the world’s daily oil flow. No longer just a geopolitical bargaining chip, Hormuz now stands as a flashpoint with real economic risk.

In past standoffs, Iran has wielded the threat of disruption more as theater than tactic. But analysts warn the current calculus has changed. With its nuclear ambitions under direct attack and few viable paths for de-escalation, Iran could move beyond bluster—forcing oil markets and global powers to confront a worst-case scenario that once seemed improbable.

A Regional Flashpoint

Tehran's strategic advantage lies in its geographical control of the northern coast of the Strait of Hormuz, enabling it to threaten shipping with a range of military and asymmetric tools. These include maritime harassment, drone attacks, sea mines, and signal jamming. Although an all-out blockade remains unlikely due to the risks involved, partial disruptions are now seen as a viable possibility.

In response to rising tensions, Greece's shipping ministry on Sunday issued new guidance urging Greek-owned vessels to reconsider passage through Hormuz. Meanwhile, traffic through the strait had continued relatively uninterrupted through last week, and Iran’s own oil exports have actually increased, underscoring the delicate balance Tehran is trying to maintain between retaliation and economic self-preservation.

Tehran’s Toolbox: From Harassment to Strategic Strikes

Iran has a variety of tools it could employ to disrupt oil flows without fully closing the strait. Past incidents have shown how Tehran has intercepted foreign tankers or directed them into Iranian waters, triggering diplomatic standoffs. Heightened harassment of commercial shipping—such as shadowing vessels with small patrol boats—could significantly raise the cost and complexity of maritime logistics in the region.

Beyond ship harassment, the Iranian military is reportedly capable of using GPS signal jamming, a tactic already affecting nearly 1,000 commercial vessels daily since June 13. This form of electronic warfare hampers navigational safety and was cited as a potential factor in a recent oil tanker collision, which, while publicly deemed unrelated, occurred shortly after Israel's strikes on Iranian targets.

Another escalatory option includes the deployment of sea mines. Though a more dangerous move due to the risk to Iran’s own shipping, selective mining could create deterrents without full-scale confrontation. A 2019 incident involving a tanker near the Gulf entrance, which the U.S. linked to Iranian mines, serves as a cautionary precedent.

The Houthi Precedent: A Playbook for Disruption

Iran could also mimic tactics used by its Houthi allies in Yemen, who have targeted commercial ships in the Red Sea with drones and missiles, prompting many vessels to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope. Although Hormuz lacks an alternative path for tankers, the psychological and logistical impacts of even a few well-timed attacks could cause serious disruptions.

While the Houthis primarily claimed to target ships connected to Israel, the U.S., or the U.K., the attacks affected global shipping regardless of ownership, highlighting how perception alone can shift commercial behavior.

Regional Vulnerabilities Beyond Hormuz

Iran’s influence over oil flow is not limited to the strait. The Basra oil fields in Iraq, situated close to the Iranian border, present another target. In 2019, Iran was blamed for drone strikes on Saudi Arabia’s Abqaiq facility, temporarily knocking out 7% of global crude supply. Although such high-impact attacks are not expected imminently, analysts say Tehran may reserve them as part of a broader retaliatory strategy.

Satellite data indicates that Iran has ramped up shipments from its Kharg Island terminal, a crucial hub for crude exports. Any attack on this facility would be economically damaging for Tehran, but it would also remove any remaining incentive to avoid striking back against regional rivals.

Worst-Case Scenario: Total Closure of Hormuz

A complete and sustained closure of the Strait of Hormuz is widely viewed as improbable but remains the most alarming potential outcome. The strait channels nearly 20 million barrels of oil and refined products each day. Despite theoretical spare capacity from OPEC+ members like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, their export routes still depend heavily on Hormuz.

Naval analysts believe that Iran lacks the capability to enforce a long-term blockade. “We don’t believe the Strait of Hormuz is going to close under any scenario,” said Navin Kumar of maritime consultancy Drewry. “Maybe for a day or two, but not more. It would be suicidal for Iran’s own economy.”

Still, even a temporary shutdown would be among the most significant trade disruptions in recent memory. “You are looking at pretty much the biggest disruption to trade flows we’ve had in decades—prices would skyrocket,” said Amrita Sen, head of research at Energy Aspects.

Timeline: Escalation of Iran–Israel Conflict

October 1, 2024
Iran launches over 200 missiles at Israeli military targets in retaliation for assassinations of Hamas and Hezbollah leaders.
October 26, 2024
Israel responds with airstrikes on IRGC assets in Syria, Iraq, and parts of Iran.
April 13, 2025
Iran conducts large-scale drone and missile attack on Israel. U.S., France, and Jordan assist in interception.
May 22, 2025
Iran executes Iraqi national accused of spying for Israel and aiding past attacks on IRGC commanders.
June 12, 2025
Israel launches precision airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities at Natanz, Isfahan, and Tabriz.
June 13, 2025
Iran retaliates with missile attacks and electronic warfare. GPS interference reported across the Gulf, affecting tanker navigation.
June 16–18, 2025
Oil prices jump 8%. Insurance premiums for tankers surge up to 40% due to growing risks in the Strait of Hormuz.
June 20, 2025
Diplomatic efforts falter. The U.S. imposes new sanctions on Iran's oil exports and banking system.
June 21, 2025
U.S. begins “Midnight Hammer” air campaign, targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure in Fordow and Isfahan.
June 22, 2025
Tehran hints at blocking the Strait of Hormuz. Greece advises tankers to avoid the passage due to increased threat levels.

Strategic Stockpiles: The Global Buffer

Fortunately for global markets, many oil-importing countries have built up strategic reserves. According to Bloomberg data, global stockpiles amount to roughly 5.8 billion barrels of crude and fuel—enough to offset short-term supply shocks. Still, analysts caution that market sentiment, not just fundamentals, would drive initial price reactions.

Despite frequent threats in the past, Iran has never carried out a full closure. But with its nuclear facilities under attack, international patience thinning, and its energy exports under threat, Tehran now faces a narrowing set of options.

The next few days could determine whether Iran leans toward calibrated disruption or escalates toward a broader confrontation—with oil markets squarely in the crosshairs.

Also Read: Oil Rises 8% on Israel-Iran Conflict as Strait of Hormuz Oil Route Faces New Risk

Follow iShook on Social Media for More Tips and Updates!

Facebook    X    YouTube    Instagram

iShook Opinion Curated by iShook Opinion and guided by Founder and CEO Beni E Rachmanov. Dive into valuable financial insights at ishookfinance.com for expert articles and latest news on finance.